2026 Honda CR-V EX-L vs. 2026 Mazda CX-5 Premium Plus Comparison Test
A comparison test between the 2026 Honda CR-V EX-L and the 2026 Mazda CX-5 Premium Plus, highlighting their differences in design, performance, and features.
Key Takeaways
- The 2026 Honda CR-V EX-L and the 2026 Mazda CX-5 Premium Plus are two of the top contenders in the compact SUV market.
- The CR-V offers a more practical and spacious interior, while the CX-5 boasts a more premium feel and design.
- The CR-V has a more efficient powertrain and lower starting price, making it the thriftier option.
- The CX-5 has a more stylish exterior design and a softer ride, but its interior design may not appeal to everyone.
- Both vehicles offer impressive performance and handling, but the CR-V takes the crown in this comparison test.
What We Tested
We tested the 2026 Honda CR-V EX-L and the 2026 Mazda CX-5 Premium Plus, both with all-wheel drive. The CR-V was powered by a 190-hp turbocharged 1.5-liter inline-four, while the CX-5 had a 187-hp 2.5-liter inline-four.
Exterior and Interior
The CR-V’s interior is roomy and easy to see out of, with high-quality materials and a simple layout. The CX-5’s interior, on the other hand, is more premium and stylish, but its digital controls may not appeal to everyone.
Powertrain and Performance
The CR-V’s powertrain is more efficient, earning EPA estimates of 27 mpg in the city and 31 mpg on the highway. The CX-5’s powertrain is more powerful, but its fuel economy is lower, with EPA estimates of 24 mpg in the city and 30 mpg on the highway.
Driving Experience
Both vehicles offer impressive performance and handling, but the CR-V takes the crown in this comparison test. The CR-V’s suspension is slightly stiffer than the CX-5’s, but it provides a more confidence-inspiring drive.
And the Winner Is…
The CR-V takes the crown thanks to its easier-to-use interior, additional usable space, and lower price. The CX-5 is still a great option, but its higher price and less practical interior design make it less desirable.
Specifications
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Vehicle Type | front-engine, all-wheel-drive, 5-passenger, 4-door wagon |
| Price | $38,350/$38,805 (CR-V), $40,485/$41,080 (CX-5) |
| Engine | 190-hp turbocharged 1.5-liter inline-four (CR-V), 187-hp 2.5-liter inline-four (CX-5) |
| Transmission | continuously variable automatic (CR-V), 6-speed automatic (CX-5) |
| Curb Weight | 3614 lb (CR-V), 3876 lb (CX-5) |
| Passenger Volume | 53/51 ft3 (CR-V), 53/50 ft3 (CX-5) |
| Cargo Volume | 77/39 ft3 (CR-V), 67/34 ft3 (CX-5) |
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: Which vehicle has a more premium interior?
The CX-5 has a more premium interior, with leather wrappings on the seats, doors, and dashboard. However, the CR-V’s interior is still high-quality and comfortable.
Q: Which vehicle has better fuel economy?
The CR-V has better fuel economy, with EPA estimates of 27 mpg in the city and 31 mpg on the highway. The CX-5’s fuel economy is lower, with EPA estimates of 24 mpg in the city and 30 mpg on the highway.
Q: Which vehicle is more practical?
The CR-V is more practical, with more usable space and a more spacious interior. It also has a lower starting price, making it the thriftier option.
